Charles Hoskinson and Vitalik Buterin Spar Over Crypto Voting
Hoskinson has refuted Buterin's recent statement advising against choosing political allegiances based solely on a candidate's stance on cryptocurrency.
July 18, 2024 01:29 PM
Reading time: 1 minute, 55 seconds
TL;DR Charles Hoskinson has openly refuted Vitalik Buterin's recent statement advising against choosing political allegiances based solely on a candidate's stance on cryptocurrency. Hoskinson argues for a single-issue voting strategy. Buterin stresses the importance of considering a politician's overall vision.
Hoskinson's Argument for Single-Issue Voting
Charles Hoskinson, co-founder of Input Output Global and the Cardano blockchain ecosystem, has openly refuted Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin's recent statement advising against choosing political allegiances based solely on a candidate's stance on cryptocurrency.
Hoskinson's post on the X platform argues that the crypto community should adopt a single-issue voting strategy focused on supporting pro-crypto candidates. He believes politicians will think twice before targeting the crypto industry if they understand the potential electoral consequences.
Crypto a Decisive Voting Issue
Additionally, the executive believes that a vote for Joe Biden would hurt the American crypto industry. Hoskinson believes that making crypto a decisive voting issue will force politicians to moderate their stance and avoid actions that could harm the industry.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently expressed his concerns, cautioning voters against backing political candidates who support cryptocurrencies without grasping the technology's underlying principles and objectives.
Buterin's Cautionary Notes
Buterin's article stresses that the crypto movement's original values, inspired by the cypherpunk ethos, focus on promoting overall freedom and decentralization beyond just financial freedom. He also highlights the potential dangers of aligning with authoritarian regimes that support crypto for their benefit while suppressing individual liberties.
"Focusing narrowly on 'pro-crypto' candidates may lead to supporting politicians whose broader values might not align with those of the crypto community," Buterin warns.
He stressed the importance of considering a politician's overall vision for technology, privacy, and internationalism rather than just their stance on cryptocurrency.
Crypto's Political Moment
However, Hoskinson differed, suggesting that 2024 voters should prioritize crypto-friendly candidates and make it a single-issue voting point. By doing so, politicians will be incentivized to moderate their stance and leave the industry alone rather than risk losing votes.
The 2024 US presidential election will likely feel the impact of merging cryptocurrency and political landscapes as candidates' crypto-related policies and views on blockchain innovation become critical to voters' decisions.
A New Era for Crypto in Politics
Results from a November 2023 Harris Poll conducted for Grayscale show that almost half of American voters (47%) plan to include cryptocurrency in their investment portfolio.
Cryptocurrency is taking center stage for the first time in a primary election, with leading candidates actively discussing its impact. This is a notable departure from previous campaigns, like Andrew Yang's, where it played a more minor role.