Did the SEC Finally Clarify the Term Crypto Asset Securities?
By Vukan Ljubojevic | TH3FUS3 Senior Writer
September 15, 2024 03:00 AM
Reading time: 1 minute, 36 seconds
TL;DR The SEC has clarified the term 'crypto asset securities,' which impacts ongoing litigation and could reshape the regulatory outlook on crypto assets. This clarification comes amidst its legal battle with Binance and addresses past confusion.
SEC Clarifies 'Crypto Asset Securities'
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has clarified the term 'crypto asset securities'. This move aims to clear up confusion in ongoing litigation against Binance.
The SEC issued an amended complaint stating that crypto assets are not considered securities. Instead, the term refers to the contracts, expectations, and understandings surrounding their sale and promotion.
Impact on Binance Case
This clarification stems from the SEC's use of the term in past cases. Notably, it appears in Footnote 6 of its amended complaint against Binance.
The SEC admitted that while the term was helpful as shorthand, it may have inadvertently caused misunderstandings. The Commission emphasized that the securities in question are not the crypto assets but the investment contracts tied to their sale and distribution.
"To avoid any confusion, the PAC no longer uses the shorthand term, and the SEC regrets any confusion it may have invited in this regard," the court document read.
Ripple's Reaction
Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, reacted critically to the SEC's clarification. He remarked on the agency's inconsistent stance. "So the SEC finally admits that 1/ 'crypto asset security' is a made-up term and 2/ to prove a 'crypto asset security' is an investment contract, the SEC needs evidence of a bundle of 'contracts, expectations, and understandings,'" Alderoty noted.
Ongoing Debate
The debate continues as critics argue that the SEC's stance has fostered legal uncertainty. John E. Deaton, a candidate for the US Senate in Massachusetts, added, "The SEC loves for the law to be vague," reflecting frustration from previous cases like the Ripple litigation. This sentiment highlights the ongoing challenges in defining and regulating crypto assets.
Industry Implications
This clarification could have significant implications for the crypto industry. Regulatory agencies and market participants must adjust to these interpretations of crypto asset classifications.
The evolving legal landscape will undoubtedly impact how crypto assets are marketed, sold, and regulated.