Contact

info@th3fus3.com



© 2024 TheFuse. All rights reserved.

Did the SEC Finally Clarify the Term Crypto Asset Securities?

By Vukan Ljubojevic | TH3FUS3 Senior Writer

September 15, 2024 03:00 AM

Reading time: 1 minute, 36 seconds

TL;DR The SEC has clarified the term 'crypto asset securities,' which impacts ongoing litigation and could reshape the regulatory outlook on crypto assets. This clarification comes amidst its legal battle with Binance and addresses past confusion.

SEC Clarifies 'Crypto Asset Securities'

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has clarified the term 'crypto asset securities'. This move aims to clear up confusion in ongoing litigation against Binance.

The SEC issued an amended complaint stating that crypto assets are not considered securities. Instead, the term refers to the contracts, expectations, and understandings surrounding their sale and promotion.

Impact on Binance Case

This clarification stems from the SEC's use of the term in past cases. Notably, it appears in Footnote 6 of its amended complaint against Binance.

The SEC admitted that while the term was helpful as shorthand, it may have inadvertently caused misunderstandings. The Commission emphasized that the securities in question are not the crypto assets but the investment contracts tied to their sale and distribution.

"To avoid any confusion, the PAC no longer uses the shorthand term, and the SEC regrets any confusion it may have invited in this regard," the court document read.

Ripple's Reaction

Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, reacted critically to the SEC's clarification. He remarked on the agency's inconsistent stance. "So the SEC finally admits that 1/ 'crypto asset security' is a made-up term and 2/ to prove a 'crypto asset security' is an investment contract, the SEC needs evidence of a bundle of 'contracts, expectations, and understandings,'" Alderoty noted.

Ongoing Debate

The debate continues as critics argue that the SEC's stance has fostered legal uncertainty. John E. Deaton, a candidate for the US Senate in Massachusetts, added, "The SEC loves for the law to be vague," reflecting frustration from previous cases like the Ripple litigation. This sentiment highlights the ongoing challenges in defining and regulating crypto assets.

Industry Implications

This clarification could have significant implications for the crypto industry. Regulatory agencies and market participants must adjust to these interpretations of crypto asset classifications.

The evolving legal landscape will undoubtedly impact how crypto assets are marketed, sold, and regulated.

Share this

Similar articles
ai

California Gov. Newsom Takes Step to Protect Actors from AI

The State lead official signed two law bills requiring actors' consent before creating and using digital replicas

16 hours ago
ntfs-ordinals

New NFT Bill in the US Gains Momentum

The bill aims to classify NFTs based on their intended use cases amid growing regulatory scrutiny

September 18, 2024 08:01 AM
cryptocurrency

Mark Cuban Is Interested in Elon Musk's X

By Anthony Burr | TH3FUS3 Managing Editor

September 18, 2024 07:58 AM
All results loaded