US Supreme Court Trashes Odd Claim Over Seized BTC
Battle Born claims that the nearly 70,000 BTC seized by the US government is theirs. They say the bought it from somebody that stole it
October 8, 2024 05:35 PM
Reading time: 2 minutes, 33 seconds
TL;DR The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from Battle Born Investments regarding the forfeiture of 69,370 bitcoins. Initially linked to the Silk Road darknet marketplace, these bitcoins are now under the US government's control.
Supreme Court's Landmark Decision
The United States Supreme Court has made a significant move by declining to hear an appeal from Battle Born Investments. This appeal was centered on the forfeiture of a staggering 69,370 bitcoins.
These digital assets were initially tied to the infamous Silk Road darknet marketplace. The court's decision, officially noted under "CERTIORARI DENIED" in the Supreme Court's October 7 publication, grants the US government the authority to seize and potentially sell these bitcoins, valued at around $4.4 billion.
The Case's Intricate Background
This case's roots lie in a civil forfeiture action initiated by the US government after the Silk Road shutdown.
Battle Born Investments claimed that they legally owned these bitcoins. They asserted that in March 2018, they had entered into a deal to acquire assets, including the controversial bitcoins in the "1HQ3" wallet, from Raymond Ngan's Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate.
They further alleged that these assets were linked to an individual dubbed "Individual X," who had stolen the bitcoins from Silk Road and was associated with Ngan.
Government's Stand on Forfeiture
US authorities, however, challenged Battle Born's assertions. They maintained that the bitcoins were rightfully subject to forfeiture because of their connection to illegal activities on the Silk Road.
In 2022, the US District Court for the Northern District of California sided with the government and ordered that the seized property be disposed of in accordance with the law.
"Mere claims of ownership, without substantial evidence, are insufficient for establishing standing in civil forfeiture cases."
Legal Proceedings and Appeals
Dissatisfied with the ruling, Battle Born Investments took their case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On August 18, 2023, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision.
The court concluded that Battle Born lacked standing to challenge the forfeiture, citing speculative claims and insufficient evidence to prove direct ownership of the bitcoins.
Following this, Battle Born sought a rehearing en banc, which was denied on December 12, 2023. Undeterred, they filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court on April 25, 2024, arguing that the lower courts had misjudged their standing and ownership claims.
However, the Supreme Court's refusal to review the case effectively upholds the lower courts' decisions.
Potential Market Implications
The Supreme Court's decision has profound implications. Denying the petition affirms that Battle Born Investments lacks the necessary standing to contest the forfeiture of the bitcoins.
This outcome transitions the 69,370 BTC from a seized status to a forfeited and sellable asset, allowing the US government to "dispose of the defendant's seized property by the law."
The US government's potential sale of such a large amount of bitcoin could significantly impact the market. Valued at approximately $4.4 billion, their liquidation could affect market dynamics and investor sentiment. Historically, news of US government sales has had a massive impact on the market.
In a noteworthy political twist, Donald Trump had promised to transfer all seized bitcoin into a "strategic national stockpile."
Following this, on July 29, the Biden-Harris administration moved 29,800 bitcoins to an unknown wallet address, adding another layer of intrigue to the ongoing developments.